A 12-megapixel zoom photo looking clearer than a 48-megapixel image wasn’t the result we expected. Neither was needing to freeze footage to spot the small improvement from roughly 12 times the video bitrate. Our iPhone 18 Pro camera test produced both results—and showed how quickly promising daylight performance can change after sunset.
We tested Apple’s Camera app, Blackmagic Camera and Final Cut Camera, comparing zoom, autofocus, handheld stabilisation, RAW photography and recording formats. Ships, moving water, metro walks and dark streets provided the subjects, with a close-up test exploring the new variable aperture.
Get vidIQ to grow your channel faster! 🚀 https://vidiq.com/bestravelvideo
iPhone 18 Pro Daylight Zoom: 0.5x to 8x
In our first daylight scene, 0.5x and 1x
produced pleasing results. Moving to 2x reduced detail in the trees, while 4x
looked stronger. At a close-to-medium distance, even 8x remained reasonably
usable.
The zoom settings do not represent five
separate lenses. The 2x option uses the main camera’s sensor, while 8x extends
the telephoto camera’s reach through a sensor crop. That distinction matters
when comparing fine detail, although the result also depends on lighting,
distance and processing.
Our examples show why it pays to inspect
the image rather than assume quality will decline evenly with every increase in
zoom.
Unlock the power of lifelike AI voices with ElevenLabs! Perfect for creators, narrators, and businesses. Try it now! Start your voice journey here: https://try.elevenlabs.io/s0jpinoze8x
iPhone 18 Pro at Sunset: Detail and
Autofocus
Sunset made the differences more obvious.
In a sweeping view recorded with Apple’s Camera app in ProRes HQ, the footage
remained acceptable through 4x, but deteriorated at 8x.
A distant ship presented a tougher
challenge. At 0.5x, we observed focus hunting, noisy shadows and visible
artefacts. Switching to 1x removed the focusing problem and produced a cleaner
result, although some sky noise remained.
At 2x, focusing stayed reliable but detail
decreased. The ship looked less convincing at 4x, and at 8x both the vessel and
the waves lost too much definition for our intended use.
Follow us at https://www.instagram.com/bestravelvideo/
https://www.tiktok.com/@bestravelvideo
Low-Light Video and Handheld Walking
Inside a reasonably illuminated metro,
handheld walking footage recorded through Blackmagic Camera showed jitter
during abrupt movements. Stabilisation helped, but sudden steps and changes in
direction remained visible.
Outside, darker scenes exposed the limits
more clearly. Increasing zoom progressively reduced usable detail until the
footage no longer met our expectations.
In a separate dark street scene, RAW
footage retained a more recognisable image despite visible noise. The ProRes HQ
examples at higher zoom settings looked considerably less useful.
https://www.patreon.com/collection/2212198
RAW vs ProRes HQ vs H.265
At 200% magnification, our
RAW-versus-ProRes HQ comparison revealed a clear difference. ProRes HQ looked
softer and more blotchy, while RAW preserved a more natural rendering. RAW
still contained noise; its advantage was how the remaining detail appeared.
Our internal RAW recording workflow used
allocated Pro Video Storage. In the demonstrated setup, we opened Settings →
Camera → Formats → Configure Pro Video Storage, selected the allocation and
tapped Update Pro Video Storage.
The separate H.265 comparison was less
dramatic. We compared footage at approximately 40 Mb/s against ProRes at
approximately 470 Mb/s. Despite the nearly twelvefold bitrate difference, the
visible improvement was small: pausing the footage revealed slightly more floor
detail in ProRes.
For that example, the larger file delivered
little obvious benefit during normal playback. We still prefer ProRes when
planning colour grading, while H.265 offers a practical balance for everyday
recording and social publishing.
RAW Photography: More Megapixels Didn’t
Always Win
For the photography comparisons, we
converted DNG files to JPEG without additional adjustments. That workflow lets
us compare the resulting images, although conversion itself still involves
image processing.
Around the pond, close-to-medium-distance
results looked satisfactory at 100%, including the 8x example. A distant ship
was more demanding, with atmospheric haze and small lettering making lost
detail easier to identify.
The 4x image struggled with fine text and
container logos. Surprisingly, the 12MP 8x example looked clearer in parts than
the 48MP 4x image.
Night photographs brought another reversal.
The 12MP 2x image showed clearer facial detail than our 1x example, while the
48MP 4x photograph contained more noise and unnatural-looking faces. The sky
also showed distracting artefacts.
These results demonstrate why resolution
alone cannot predict the better photograph.
Apple Camera vs Blackmagic vs Final Cut
Camera
In cloudy, rainy conditions, we compared
handheld footage from Apple’s Camera app and Blackmagic Camera. Image quality
looked broadly similar, although Blackmagic offered additional control over
H.265 bitrate.
Final Cut Camera provided another
manual-control option, without a meaningful image-quality advantage in the
example shown.
Stabilisation was more revealing. During
our walking and hyperlapse comparisons, Apple’s Camera app sometimes controlled
vertical movement better than Blackmagic. Changing the recording frame rate in
Blackmagic did not remove that difference in our examples.
For spontaneous travel footage, the
convenience of the stock app therefore remained valuable.
Variable Aperture: What Changed in
Close-Up?
We tested the variable aperture with a
tightly framed subject, keeping the composition consistent while changing the
opening from f/1.48 to f/4.
The close-up made the depth-of-field
difference easier to see. At f/2.8, the background remained optically blurred
without relying on Portrait mode effects; stopping down to f/4 brought more of
the scene into focus.
Our preferred balance was f/2.8 when
sufficient light was available. The feature adds creative control, but its
visible effect depends on the subject distance and composition.
For our travel shooting, Apple’s Camera app
remains convenient for quick handheld clips. Final Cut Camera and Blackmagic
Camera offer more deliberate control, while RAW is most useful when the project
justifies additional storage and post-production work.
Before you leave, check out this video:
iPhone 18 Pro Video Guide: Blackmagic Camera Settings & Variable Iris Explained